Glenn Beck analyzes one of Obama's clips from 2001 and reveals the marxist philosphy in Obama's words.
Glenn Beck does a fabulous job in his commentary explaining the message behind Obama's words. I urge every American to do your homework. Understand the dangers that this type of thinking will have on our Constitution, our people, and our wonderful country. It does not matter what side of the aisle this line of thinking comes from, it is destructive, manipulative, and dangerous for the future of this nation.
Let me end with the oath that every President takes when he enters office. Read it, then ask yourself: How can a president faithfully execute his Office of President when the powers of that office are derived from a document he/she does not believe in? How can a president who wants to change a Constitution that he/she believes is flawed, protect that very Constitution? It is our Constitution that protects us as Americans. It is our Constitution that keeps us free from tyranny, opression, and slavery. It is our Constitution that grants us, THE PEOPLE, liberty. Whether you are Democrat or Republican, the one thing we should all fight together for is Liberty.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." - Presidential Oath of Office
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Judge Throws Out Lawsuit Claiming Obama Not Eligible For Presidency
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit challenging Barack Obama's qualifications to be president.
On August 21, 2008, Philip J. Berg, a lifetime Democrat, alleges that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen. His lawsuit claimed that Obama was born in Kenya, and therefore not a "natural born citizen." He also claimed that as a boy, Obama moved to Indonesia and attended school there as a citizen of THAT country. If either of the above is true, Obama is ineligible as outlined by the United States Constitution. Barack Obama and the DNC have both been aware of this lawsuit since it was filed, and have not, as of yet, produced any evidence to the contrary. The birth certificate on Obama's website from Hawaii has also been deemed to be a forgery due to inconsistencies.
U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit ruling that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters." Berg has appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court.
As a citizen of this country, doesn't it serve our best interest to at least have Obama present a valid birth certificate? Yet, instead of silencing those who believe otherwise, he has failed to prove his citizenship of this nation!
What could have been going through the mind of this "judge" when he gave his reasoning for the dismissal? I would like to know if he was pressured into this ruling or if he is just ignorant. Let's look at his comments.
First of all, he stated that Philip Berg lacked "standing" to bring a case against Barack Obama. Is there any better "standing" than being a United States citizen? Does the Constitution not outline a government that is answerable to the people? Are they not OUR voice? Are they not a government FOR and OF the people? How is it then, that a U.S. citizen cannot bring a case against a Senator for NOT MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR PRESIDENT! Berg is doing his constitutional duty. It is actually all of our duty TO HOLD GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE! Or have we forgotton...
Secondly, Judge Surrick claimed that any harm from any ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters." So he is essentially saying, the claim is "vague" (seems pretty cut and dry to me) and the effects too "attenuated" (too narrow or diminishing to measure). Let me make this clear. The "judge" in this case is basically saying that the case has no merit, and even if it does, what harm could an ineligible candidate bring to the country?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? Has our Constitution not undergone enough harm over the last few years? We have a government that has seriously handcuffed our Bill of Rights. We have a Congress that ignores the people and makes decisions that might be unpopular but "is in the best interest" of the nation (ie. bailouts). If over 90% of the people tell you NO, YOU DO NOT PASS LEGISLATION THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE! And now, this "judge" wants to know what "effects" will befall the voter if someone ineligible were to run for president? Let's see here...
1) If the allegations are true (which the defendant has yet to admit ANY evidence to the contrary) Barack Obama would have pulled the greatest fraud EVER in an election campaign - and possibly in history.
2) The Democratic National Convention would be a conspirator to the fraudulent CRIMINAL activities perpetuated by Obama and his campaign.
3) Ignoring the mandates established by our founding fathers on eligibility for presidency could open the door for anyone to run for office.
4) The Constitution, which has been ignored by the Executive Branch, and the Legislative Branch, will NOW BE IGNORED BY THE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED TO INSURE THE CONSTITUTION IS FOLLOWED!
5) A dismissal of the case will cause a split in the electorate that may never be repaired. If you cannot trust your leaders in Congress, your president, or the justice system, it will cause a constitutional crisis in this country. Imagine the dissent if Obama is elected without clearing up his citizenship (ask yourself why he has not)?
6) It raises the question about the integrity of one of the candidates. If this fundamental criteria is ignored by Obama and he wins the election, what other parts of the Constitution is he willing to dismiss?
Personally, I hold this judge in contempt! This is a cowardly decision and he should be ashamed of himself. Hopefully the U.S. Supreme Court will carry out their Constitutional duty and at least hear the case. My fear, as it should be with all of you, is that they will not.
On August 21, 2008, Philip J. Berg, a lifetime Democrat, alleges that Barack Obama is not a U.S. citizen. His lawsuit claimed that Obama was born in Kenya, and therefore not a "natural born citizen." He also claimed that as a boy, Obama moved to Indonesia and attended school there as a citizen of THAT country. If either of the above is true, Obama is ineligible as outlined by the United States Constitution. Barack Obama and the DNC have both been aware of this lawsuit since it was filed, and have not, as of yet, produced any evidence to the contrary. The birth certificate on Obama's website from Hawaii has also been deemed to be a forgery due to inconsistencies.
U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick on Friday night rejected the suit ruling that Berg lacked standing to bring the case, saying any harm from an allegedly ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters." Berg has appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court.
As a citizen of this country, doesn't it serve our best interest to at least have Obama present a valid birth certificate? Yet, instead of silencing those who believe otherwise, he has failed to prove his citizenship of this nation!
What could have been going through the mind of this "judge" when he gave his reasoning for the dismissal? I would like to know if he was pressured into this ruling or if he is just ignorant. Let's look at his comments.
First of all, he stated that Philip Berg lacked "standing" to bring a case against Barack Obama. Is there any better "standing" than being a United States citizen? Does the Constitution not outline a government that is answerable to the people? Are they not OUR voice? Are they not a government FOR and OF the people? How is it then, that a U.S. citizen cannot bring a case against a Senator for NOT MEETING THE CRITERIA FOR PRESIDENT! Berg is doing his constitutional duty. It is actually all of our duty TO HOLD GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABLE! Or have we forgotton...
Secondly, Judge Surrick claimed that any harm from any ineligible candidate was "too vague and its effects too attenuated to confer standing on any and all voters." So he is essentially saying, the claim is "vague" (seems pretty cut and dry to me) and the effects too "attenuated" (too narrow or diminishing to measure). Let me make this clear. The "judge" in this case is basically saying that the case has no merit, and even if it does, what harm could an ineligible candidate bring to the country?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME???? Has our Constitution not undergone enough harm over the last few years? We have a government that has seriously handcuffed our Bill of Rights. We have a Congress that ignores the people and makes decisions that might be unpopular but "is in the best interest" of the nation (ie. bailouts). If over 90% of the people tell you NO, YOU DO NOT PASS LEGISLATION THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE! And now, this "judge" wants to know what "effects" will befall the voter if someone ineligible were to run for president? Let's see here...
1) If the allegations are true (which the defendant has yet to admit ANY evidence to the contrary) Barack Obama would have pulled the greatest fraud EVER in an election campaign - and possibly in history.
2) The Democratic National Convention would be a conspirator to the fraudulent CRIMINAL activities perpetuated by Obama and his campaign.
3) Ignoring the mandates established by our founding fathers on eligibility for presidency could open the door for anyone to run for office.
4) The Constitution, which has been ignored by the Executive Branch, and the Legislative Branch, will NOW BE IGNORED BY THE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED TO INSURE THE CONSTITUTION IS FOLLOWED!
5) A dismissal of the case will cause a split in the electorate that may never be repaired. If you cannot trust your leaders in Congress, your president, or the justice system, it will cause a constitutional crisis in this country. Imagine the dissent if Obama is elected without clearing up his citizenship (ask yourself why he has not)?
6) It raises the question about the integrity of one of the candidates. If this fundamental criteria is ignored by Obama and he wins the election, what other parts of the Constitution is he willing to dismiss?
Personally, I hold this judge in contempt! This is a cowardly decision and he should be ashamed of himself. Hopefully the U.S. Supreme Court will carry out their Constitutional duty and at least hear the case. My fear, as it should be with all of you, is that they will not.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Sunday, October 19, 2008
The Destabilization of America
Yuri Bezmenov, expert on Soviet propaganda and disinformation, escaped to the United States in 1970.
This entire sixteen minute interview, recorded twenty-four years ago, is an alarming prophesy of the Communist infiltration that has rapidly taken root in America and is now in its final stages.
This entire sixteen minute interview, recorded twenty-four years ago, is an alarming prophesy of the Communist infiltration that has rapidly taken root in America and is now in its final stages.
Monday, October 13, 2008
Did Capitalism Fail?
I was talking to an Obama supporter yesterday, and asked them simply, "do you understand that Obama is essentially promoting socialism?" They answered yes. I was shocked at their response, and asked if they support the idea of America becoming a communist state. They looked at me, and said "well, capitalism sure didn't work!"
Shock and awe are two words that describe how I feel about this new movement towards socialism. The fact that people actually believe capitalism failed acknowledges that either they are ignorant, or that, as usual, the media has betrayed what we may soon refer to as the "old republic."
Capitalism has not failed. Capitalism and free markets do not fail. They go through peaks and valleys for sure, but they do not fail. The free market produces hard work, accountability, and most of all savings. The power behind the market is the workers, something we never have a shortage of in America. Savings is the true definition of capital. It is what we are left with when we have used all we need for living.
However, thanks to big government, bigger corporations, and most of all, the federal reserve, we have allowed a monetary system to be put in place that creates debt, not capital. It is erronious to call our current system capitalistic. Instead, we have central planning, from a central bank, who control the markets through manipulation. This is not free, and it is exactly why the free market system is not working!
My argument is simple. The failure of the market is due to big government and their insistance on an obviously failed monetary policy. Their solution is bigger government, a bigger central bank (world bank), which, in turn would create bigger corporations and even more control for the current monopolies. More government control, more debt, and a continued decrease in our God given rights and Constitutional freedoms is the end result of this socialist march.
The solution seems simple enough to me.
"Our government has lived beyond its means for decades. We now face a crucial juncture, at which we determine whether to continue down the path of debt, inflation, and government intervention or choose to return to the economics of the free market, which have been ignored for almost a century. Increased debt leads to higher taxes on future generations, while increased inflation diminishes the purchasing power of American families and destroys the dollar. No society has ever been achieved prosperity through indebtedness or inflation, and the United States is no exception. We cannot afford to continue our current policies of monetary expansion and unending bailouts. Unless we return to sound monetary policy, sharply reduce government expenditures, and realize that the government cannot act as a lender of last resort, we will drive our economy to ruin." - Ron Paul
Shock and awe are two words that describe how I feel about this new movement towards socialism. The fact that people actually believe capitalism failed acknowledges that either they are ignorant, or that, as usual, the media has betrayed what we may soon refer to as the "old republic."
Capitalism has not failed. Capitalism and free markets do not fail. They go through peaks and valleys for sure, but they do not fail. The free market produces hard work, accountability, and most of all savings. The power behind the market is the workers, something we never have a shortage of in America. Savings is the true definition of capital. It is what we are left with when we have used all we need for living.
However, thanks to big government, bigger corporations, and most of all, the federal reserve, we have allowed a monetary system to be put in place that creates debt, not capital. It is erronious to call our current system capitalistic. Instead, we have central planning, from a central bank, who control the markets through manipulation. This is not free, and it is exactly why the free market system is not working!
My argument is simple. The failure of the market is due to big government and their insistance on an obviously failed monetary policy. Their solution is bigger government, a bigger central bank (world bank), which, in turn would create bigger corporations and even more control for the current monopolies. More government control, more debt, and a continued decrease in our God given rights and Constitutional freedoms is the end result of this socialist march.
The solution seems simple enough to me.
"Our government has lived beyond its means for decades. We now face a crucial juncture, at which we determine whether to continue down the path of debt, inflation, and government intervention or choose to return to the economics of the free market, which have been ignored for almost a century. Increased debt leads to higher taxes on future generations, while increased inflation diminishes the purchasing power of American families and destroys the dollar. No society has ever been achieved prosperity through indebtedness or inflation, and the United States is no exception. We cannot afford to continue our current policies of monetary expansion and unending bailouts. Unless we return to sound monetary policy, sharply reduce government expenditures, and realize that the government cannot act as a lender of last resort, we will drive our economy to ruin." - Ron Paul
Saturday, October 11, 2008
The Case Against Obama
On August 21, 2008, Philip J. Berg, a Pennsylvainian lawyer and lifelong democrat, filed suit against Barack Obama claiming that he is not eligible to run for president because he is not a natural born citizen. There are only three requirements to run for president in these United States as stipulated in our Constitution:
1. Candidate MUST be 35 years of age
2. Candidate MUST have been a resident in the U.S. for 14 years prior to running
3. Candidate MUST be a natural born citizen
To fulfill the requirements by law, and to have the case dropped, all Barack has to do is provide a birth certificate to the court. To date, he has not complied and has, instead, used his lawyers to stall procedings until after the election. Why won't he produce the documents? Why not put this to rest? Perhaps he cannot. Perhaps he really IS the fraud anyone with sense understands him to be. Watch the video below and decide for yourself. Then do the research.
If you are an Obama supporter, I urge you not to take what the media says at face value. Understand the issues. Understand the dangers. Trust me, I am no fan of John McCain. He will not receive my vote. Neither will Obama. Until you, the voter, understand the dangers of where your political parties are leading you, we, as a nation, will not be free. If you inform yourself about your candidate, and still cast your lot with Obama or McCain, then at least you will understand what you are voting for and what you are getting.
Just don't complain when you get what you deserve.
1. Candidate MUST be 35 years of age
2. Candidate MUST have been a resident in the U.S. for 14 years prior to running
3. Candidate MUST be a natural born citizen
To fulfill the requirements by law, and to have the case dropped, all Barack has to do is provide a birth certificate to the court. To date, he has not complied and has, instead, used his lawyers to stall procedings until after the election. Why won't he produce the documents? Why not put this to rest? Perhaps he cannot. Perhaps he really IS the fraud anyone with sense understands him to be. Watch the video below and decide for yourself. Then do the research.
If you are an Obama supporter, I urge you not to take what the media says at face value. Understand the issues. Understand the dangers. Trust me, I am no fan of John McCain. He will not receive my vote. Neither will Obama. Until you, the voter, understand the dangers of where your political parties are leading you, we, as a nation, will not be free. If you inform yourself about your candidate, and still cast your lot with Obama or McCain, then at least you will understand what you are voting for and what you are getting.
Just don't complain when you get what you deserve.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
Archived Evidence Proving Obama Was A Member Of Socialist 'New Party'
Great article from American Thinker. Link to archived documents at bottom of page.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/archives_prove_obama_was_a_new.html
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/archives_prove_obama_was_a_new.html
Tuesday, October 7, 2008
The Odinga Connection
Raila Odinga has, in his own words, a ‘close personal friendship’ with Barack Hussein Obama.
So who is this guy?
Raila Odinga, the Prime Minister of Kenya and Barack Obama, Democratic candidate for President of the U.S. are from the same Kenyan tribe. They are also cousins.
The mainstream media will stop here, but let's look deeper shall we?
In 2006, Barack Obama took a trip to Kenya and voiced his support for his fellow tribesman and political ally, Odinga. Odinga was running on the socialist/democrat ticket in Kenya and wanted to bring the whole of Kenya under Sharia law. After the election in which Odinga lost, he gathered his army of supporters and terrorized the Kenyan people. His "supporters," who are mostly radical muslims, are the same ones who burned alive Christians trapped inside of churches, and the same ones who have pushed for Sharia law, banning of all religions beside Islam, and the closing of all co-ed schools. After WEEKS of murder and rape, where over 300,00 people were left homeless, the Kenyan government created the new office of Prime Minister to alleviate the violence. Through blood and tears, this man now shares power in the Kenyan government.
During Obama's visit to Kenya (payed by your tax dollars of course) he enjoyed rock star status. He was the local boy who had overwhelming success in American politics. Crowds flocked to see him and hear him speak, and Odinga, who rarely left Barack's side, benefitted directly from his fame. Obama campaigned directly for Odinga, sharing the stage and microphone with his cousin throughout his visit. He even spoke at a university in Nairobi where he verbally attacked the sitting Kenyan leadership (Kibaki) calling them 'corrupt.' Mike Flannery, political editor for CBS2 in Nairobi, reported that Obama had accused the Kibaki government (Odinga’s opponent) of corruption “almost every day since he arrived.” After his visit, he filed with the US Federal Elections Commission for his presidential candidacy. He decided America needed change.
Ironically, Odinga was running his campaign on the idea of "CHANGE." Although Kenya was one of the most stable places in Africa, a friend to the United States, and a stalwart ally to the U.S. in the war on terror, Obama flew down on taxpayer money to speak out against the current government despite the fact that Odinga was partnering with Islamic jihadists! Obama willingly associated with the evil men who were behind the violence in Kenya after Odinga's loss at the polls!
Why aren't we hearing about this from the media? Why don't people know? Why are people voting for this man Barack?? I've written other posts about some of Obama's other questionable ties but this one is the scariest. This one speaks to the heart of what kind of man Obama is! We should be asking question after question of Obama and his campaign, because he is running for President!
Although Barack denies being muslim, he DID go to the madrassas in Jakarta and was a practicing muslim. His father was a muslim. His stepfather was a muslim, and in Islam, no matter what your mother is, if your father is a muslim, so are you!! This would be a good time to note that the church Obama does attend now, although "christian," reeks of hatred and anti-American sentiment.
Did he leave Islam, and if so, why the silence? If so, why has the muslim world not called for his head as an apostate? (they instead celebrate his run for president - yes, our enemies support him)!!! If so, WHY DOES HE SUPPORT MEN LIKE ODINGA?
I'm afraid most Americans will only learn of the truth after the election.
(video below)
So who is this guy?
Raila Odinga, the Prime Minister of Kenya and Barack Obama, Democratic candidate for President of the U.S. are from the same Kenyan tribe. They are also cousins.
The mainstream media will stop here, but let's look deeper shall we?
In 2006, Barack Obama took a trip to Kenya and voiced his support for his fellow tribesman and political ally, Odinga. Odinga was running on the socialist/democrat ticket in Kenya and wanted to bring the whole of Kenya under Sharia law. After the election in which Odinga lost, he gathered his army of supporters and terrorized the Kenyan people. His "supporters," who are mostly radical muslims, are the same ones who burned alive Christians trapped inside of churches, and the same ones who have pushed for Sharia law, banning of all religions beside Islam, and the closing of all co-ed schools. After WEEKS of murder and rape, where over 300,00 people were left homeless, the Kenyan government created the new office of Prime Minister to alleviate the violence. Through blood and tears, this man now shares power in the Kenyan government.
During Obama's visit to Kenya (payed by your tax dollars of course) he enjoyed rock star status. He was the local boy who had overwhelming success in American politics. Crowds flocked to see him and hear him speak, and Odinga, who rarely left Barack's side, benefitted directly from his fame. Obama campaigned directly for Odinga, sharing the stage and microphone with his cousin throughout his visit. He even spoke at a university in Nairobi where he verbally attacked the sitting Kenyan leadership (Kibaki) calling them 'corrupt.' Mike Flannery, political editor for CBS2 in Nairobi, reported that Obama had accused the Kibaki government (Odinga’s opponent) of corruption “almost every day since he arrived.” After his visit, he filed with the US Federal Elections Commission for his presidential candidacy. He decided America needed change.
Ironically, Odinga was running his campaign on the idea of "CHANGE." Although Kenya was one of the most stable places in Africa, a friend to the United States, and a stalwart ally to the U.S. in the war on terror, Obama flew down on taxpayer money to speak out against the current government despite the fact that Odinga was partnering with Islamic jihadists! Obama willingly associated with the evil men who were behind the violence in Kenya after Odinga's loss at the polls!
Why aren't we hearing about this from the media? Why don't people know? Why are people voting for this man Barack?? I've written other posts about some of Obama's other questionable ties but this one is the scariest. This one speaks to the heart of what kind of man Obama is! We should be asking question after question of Obama and his campaign, because he is running for President!
Although Barack denies being muslim, he DID go to the madrassas in Jakarta and was a practicing muslim. His father was a muslim. His stepfather was a muslim, and in Islam, no matter what your mother is, if your father is a muslim, so are you!! This would be a good time to note that the church Obama does attend now, although "christian," reeks of hatred and anti-American sentiment.
Did he leave Islam, and if so, why the silence? If so, why has the muslim world not called for his head as an apostate? (they instead celebrate his run for president - yes, our enemies support him)!!! If so, WHY DOES HE SUPPORT MEN LIKE ODINGA?
I'm afraid most Americans will only learn of the truth after the election.
(video below)
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Why We Have Bailouts
Top 10 Corporate PAC Contributors:
Obama:
Goldman Sachs $739,521
UBS AG $419,550
Lehman Brothers $391,774
Citigroup Inc $492,548
Morgan Stanley $341,380
Latham & Watkins $328,879
Google Inc $487,355
JPMorgan Chase & Co $475,112
Sidley Austin LLP $370,916
Skadden, Arps et al $360,409
McCain:
Merrill Lynch $349,170
Citigroup Inc $287,801
Morgan Stanley $249,377
Wachovia Corp $147,456
Goldman Sachs $220,045
Lehman Brothers $115,707
Bear Stearns $108,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $206,392
Bank of America $133,975
Credit Suisse Group $175,503
(Data from Center for Responsive Politics )
side note: Corporations operating in American Samoa - $33 million in pork in bailout package
PELOSI CONNECTION:
*Largest employer in Samoa is Starkist *Starkist's parent company is Del Monte
*PAUL PELOSI (Nancy's husband) has a 17 million share interest in Del Monte
*Del Monte is headquartered in San Francisco
Obama:
Goldman Sachs $739,521
UBS AG $419,550
Lehman Brothers $391,774
Citigroup Inc $492,548
Morgan Stanley $341,380
Latham & Watkins $328,879
Google Inc $487,355
JPMorgan Chase & Co $475,112
Sidley Austin LLP $370,916
Skadden, Arps et al $360,409
McCain:
Merrill Lynch $349,170
Citigroup Inc $287,801
Morgan Stanley $249,377
Wachovia Corp $147,456
Goldman Sachs $220,045
Lehman Brothers $115,707
Bear Stearns $108,000
JPMorgan Chase & Co $206,392
Bank of America $133,975
Credit Suisse Group $175,503
(Data from Center for Responsive Politics )
side note: Corporations operating in American Samoa - $33 million in pork in bailout package
PELOSI CONNECTION:
*Largest employer in Samoa is Starkist *Starkist's parent company is Del Monte
*PAUL PELOSI (Nancy's husband) has a 17 million share interest in Del Monte
*Del Monte is headquartered in San Francisco
Saturday, October 4, 2008
America Loses Again
Watching John McCain refuse to stand against the bailout bill was just another indication of how poorly he represents the majority of his voting base. How can the leader of the Republican Party, after claiming he has not nor would not support bills filled with "pork," vote for a bill that may be the most atrocious and alarming bill ever to pass through Congress? The fact that Barack Obama signed this travesty is no surprise. Yet, McCain, given the opportunity to possibly win the election by fighting against the "bailout," has alienated himself from his supporters once again.
Looking back, it really is no surprise. This "maverick" has not exactly been a stalwart defender of conservative values throughout his career. His bipartisan approach is definitely not what is needed in the Republican party. In 2002, he helped introduce the McCain-Feingold bill, probably the single most destructive legislation to freedom of speech ever passed through Congress.
Now every conservative is calling for Obama's head because of his criminal ties to Fannie and Freddie, but they forget that McCain was one of the first senators to flirt with criminal dealings with corporate institutions. In fact, in the 80's he joined four Democrats in taking "contributions" from Charles Keating, head of a Savings and Loan Association that was investing their depositors' federally insured savings in risky ventures. When those lost money, Keating tried to hide the losses from regulators by inducing his customers to switch from insured accounts to uninsured (and worthless) bonds issued by Lincoln's near-bankrupt parent company. These five senators, known as the Keating Five were involved in one of the most scandalous events in Congressional history. Until now.
The Savings and Loan crisis of the 80's resulted in the government "bailing out" hundreds of S&L's who were involved in similar criminal activity. Much like this current bailout, the burden fell to the taxpayers of this country.
Is it really any surprise then, that both Obama and McCain voted for this current "bailout" bill? Barack has profited tremendously from his association with Freddie and Fannie execs Franklin Raines and James Johnson, taking "contributions" much like McCain did in the 80's. These same two men, Raines and Johnson, have also been highly active in the decision making of Obama's campaign.
McCain, on the other hand, has announced, if elected, he would appoint N.Y. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York governor Mario Cuomo) as the head of the SEC. When A. Cuomo became Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Secretary in 1997, he axed a federal loan sale program that had saved the US $2.2 billion between 1994 and 1997 and reinstituted a system that lost the government money while earning billions for favored friends.
His time serving in office in N.Y. has been marred by rumors of corruption.
http://www.dunwalke.com/sidebars/andrew_cuomo.htm
http://thekomisarscoop.com/2006/08/30/fees-for-our-friends-the-andrew-cuomo-scandal-the-vendetta/
Sound familiar?
McCain and Obama may wear different hats in the political arena, but when those hats are off, maybe these two men are not quite so different. The sad truth of this election year is that whoever wins, America loses...again.
Looking back, it really is no surprise. This "maverick" has not exactly been a stalwart defender of conservative values throughout his career. His bipartisan approach is definitely not what is needed in the Republican party. In 2002, he helped introduce the McCain-Feingold bill, probably the single most destructive legislation to freedom of speech ever passed through Congress.
Now every conservative is calling for Obama's head because of his criminal ties to Fannie and Freddie, but they forget that McCain was one of the first senators to flirt with criminal dealings with corporate institutions. In fact, in the 80's he joined four Democrats in taking "contributions" from Charles Keating, head of a Savings and Loan Association that was investing their depositors' federally insured savings in risky ventures. When those lost money, Keating tried to hide the losses from regulators by inducing his customers to switch from insured accounts to uninsured (and worthless) bonds issued by Lincoln's near-bankrupt parent company. These five senators, known as the Keating Five were involved in one of the most scandalous events in Congressional history. Until now.
The Savings and Loan crisis of the 80's resulted in the government "bailing out" hundreds of S&L's who were involved in similar criminal activity. Much like this current bailout, the burden fell to the taxpayers of this country.
Is it really any surprise then, that both Obama and McCain voted for this current "bailout" bill? Barack has profited tremendously from his association with Freddie and Fannie execs Franklin Raines and James Johnson, taking "contributions" much like McCain did in the 80's. These same two men, Raines and Johnson, have also been highly active in the decision making of Obama's campaign.
McCain, on the other hand, has announced, if elected, he would appoint N.Y. Attorney General Andrew Cuomo (son of former New York governor Mario Cuomo) as the head of the SEC. When A. Cuomo became Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD) Secretary in 1997, he axed a federal loan sale program that had saved the US $2.2 billion between 1994 and 1997 and reinstituted a system that lost the government money while earning billions for favored friends.
His time serving in office in N.Y. has been marred by rumors of corruption.
http://www.dunwalke.com/sidebars/andrew_cuomo.htm
http://thekomisarscoop.com/2006/08/30/fees-for-our-friends-the-andrew-cuomo-scandal-the-vendetta/
Sound familiar?
McCain and Obama may wear different hats in the political arena, but when those hats are off, maybe these two men are not quite so different. The sad truth of this election year is that whoever wins, America loses...again.
Friday, October 3, 2008
An Argument For Homeschool
This article might be interesting for any parent who cares about what their kids learn in school.
http://theamericansentinel.com/2008/10/03/nazi-style-christianity-makes-its-way-to-american-schools/
http://theamericansentinel.com/2008/10/03/nazi-style-christianity-makes-its-way-to-american-schools/
This Is Treason
I am angry. So should be ALL Americans. Whether you support or oppose the bailout, the majority have spoken and been ignored. Our "leaders" in Congress have passed legislation contrary to the will of the people. It has happened before, but never this blatant, never this calculated.
We no longer have a government of the people or for the people. Those in power only serve themselves. They prance and promise but only to their own benefit. They lie and cheat and steal. They serve their own interests. They are corrupt. They are out of control. They are traitors.
I submit that we live in a monopolistic society. Media, Industry, and Government are all controlled by a handful of people. This cannot be allowed to go on any longer. Capitalism cannot function under a monopoly and a free market system cannot survive under central planning. The curtain has been drawn, and for those that can see, look hard at what has been exposed in this election year. It is a sham. It is a facade. It is a web of lies that we are all caught up in.
It is time for us to say no. It is time for us to take a stand. They have ignored us. They have rejected the will of the people and rejected the Constitution in the process. I make a public plea to ALL Americans - reject this charade we call government. They are elitists and they do not care about you and me. They have made this obvious.
I am a conservative. It is apparent to me, as it should be to all of you, my party has left me. They no longer stand for conservative ideals, conservative principles, conservative economic policy. These "neoconservatives are statists - and are hell bent on destroying our constitutional freedoms and ignoring the constraints of the constitution. I say to my fellow conservatives, "OPEN YOUR EYES!" The republican party is not representing us!!
To Democrats that are rational. Your party has left you. These "progressives" are hell bent on supplanting individualism and constitutional freedoms and replacing it with communism. You see, we may have fundamental differences on how a free society should function, but OPEN YOUR EYES!! Whether you like it or not, we are all in the same boat. This may be the most important time in American history because the very idea of freedom is at stake!
Any senator or representative who voted for this bailout plan should be tried for treason. I submit that if the founding fathers walked into this farce we call Congress, they would hang the majority of those representing us - hang them for treason! There are a few who still care, but they have become the minority. I urge these few to keep fighting, to keep standing for the people and for the Constitution, and I thank you for your voice.
To the voting public - if you really care for these United States, care for freedom and the Constitution, I say let your voice be heard. Vote third party. Reject the two choices that the media has given us. Reject both parties as they have rejected us. It doesn't matter who you vote for, but do not vote for evil. For too long we have voted for the "lesser of two evils." The greatest trick they ever played was convincing all of us that a vote for someone outside the major parties was a "wasted vote." A vote is never wasted. It is your way of standing up and saying NO. If you were the only one, would it not be worth it to say out loud "I CANNOT ACCEPT THIS ANY LONGER!! I DESERVE BETTER!! WE DESERVE BETTER!! But we are not one, we are many. Let us stand together!!
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."- Samuel Adams
We no longer have a government of the people or for the people. Those in power only serve themselves. They prance and promise but only to their own benefit. They lie and cheat and steal. They serve their own interests. They are corrupt. They are out of control. They are traitors.
I submit that we live in a monopolistic society. Media, Industry, and Government are all controlled by a handful of people. This cannot be allowed to go on any longer. Capitalism cannot function under a monopoly and a free market system cannot survive under central planning. The curtain has been drawn, and for those that can see, look hard at what has been exposed in this election year. It is a sham. It is a facade. It is a web of lies that we are all caught up in.
It is time for us to say no. It is time for us to take a stand. They have ignored us. They have rejected the will of the people and rejected the Constitution in the process. I make a public plea to ALL Americans - reject this charade we call government. They are elitists and they do not care about you and me. They have made this obvious.
I am a conservative. It is apparent to me, as it should be to all of you, my party has left me. They no longer stand for conservative ideals, conservative principles, conservative economic policy. These "neoconservatives are statists - and are hell bent on destroying our constitutional freedoms and ignoring the constraints of the constitution. I say to my fellow conservatives, "OPEN YOUR EYES!" The republican party is not representing us!!
To Democrats that are rational. Your party has left you. These "progressives" are hell bent on supplanting individualism and constitutional freedoms and replacing it with communism. You see, we may have fundamental differences on how a free society should function, but OPEN YOUR EYES!! Whether you like it or not, we are all in the same boat. This may be the most important time in American history because the very idea of freedom is at stake!
Any senator or representative who voted for this bailout plan should be tried for treason. I submit that if the founding fathers walked into this farce we call Congress, they would hang the majority of those representing us - hang them for treason! There are a few who still care, but they have become the minority. I urge these few to keep fighting, to keep standing for the people and for the Constitution, and I thank you for your voice.
To the voting public - if you really care for these United States, care for freedom and the Constitution, I say let your voice be heard. Vote third party. Reject the two choices that the media has given us. Reject both parties as they have rejected us. It doesn't matter who you vote for, but do not vote for evil. For too long we have voted for the "lesser of two evils." The greatest trick they ever played was convincing all of us that a vote for someone outside the major parties was a "wasted vote." A vote is never wasted. It is your way of standing up and saying NO. If you were the only one, would it not be worth it to say out loud "I CANNOT ACCEPT THIS ANY LONGER!! I DESERVE BETTER!! WE DESERVE BETTER!! But we are not one, we are many. Let us stand together!!
"If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen."- Samuel Adams
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
